Small meeting in the State University’s philosophy (...)

This was a more informal meeting where a friend invited me to speak with her colleagues – four men and two women – all teachers. As they were all very familiar with German philosophy, I spoke about Carl Améry (former chairman of PEN) who, going through the accounts of intellectual meetings in the East and West in the eighties, was surprised : “we all thought the crucial question was the confrontation between capitalism and communism – but already at that time, the problems were altogether different ones …the threat on our biosphere…”

There was a lot of interest expressed for Hans Jonas’ book. They kept saying : everything that we are being told about globalisation at the moment is a hundred percent positive. When I spoke a bit about the social forums and Porto Alegre, I had to promise to come back and say more.

Rights and duties

The co-director of the University of Languages and Culture, Levan Lebanidze, a very well-known ethnologist and philosopher :

You begin with rights : “We are all responsible for making sure that Human Rights are reaffirmed in our ways of thinking and in our actions”. I think stressing rights is exactly what’s going to lead to our ruin. I don’t like this beginning !

I found this comment unfair. But it came back to me when, on the plane back, I was flicking through the free magazine, encouraging me to benefit from attractive weekends just a few hours from Berlin and Paris : “you have the right !” The right to thoughtlessly pollute the atmosphere. Who wants to know that aeroplanes’ kerosene consumption does not come into any project restricting CO2s ? Who wants to get informed about what bothers them ? Who knows how to make a clear distinction between Human rights and abusive rights ? It seems a lot harder to gain awareness of responsibilities than to gain awareness of rights.

Protection of the environment : the Charter alone is not enough…

A student :

“The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline is supposed to cross the Borjomi valley, a natural park where a mineral water spring renowned throughout the ex-USSR is located. The risks are huge for this natural treasure. What can we do ?”

The Georgians really rallied together. The big protests in July and August and the speeches to the president were not in vain ; but British Petroleum, Total and Donald Rumsfeld are stronger. How does one answer back ? I know that in France, there is a new organisation, Sherpa, set up by the former secretary general of the International Federation for Human Rights, which aims to bring legal advisors’ expertise together in order to take action against multinationals that don’t respect international agreements. Sherpa is interested in the issue of this pipeline. It’s David against Goliath. And the Georgians are finding themselves between two avid Goliaths.

I’m finishing with this difficult question. It reiterates that in addition to the Charter, we have to do something else ; and the same goes when we have to say that we don’t know. There are different ways to express our solidarity.

As Edith emphasised, the Charter text is a pre-text. It asks us to engage with it and to adapt it by transforming it. It is also an opportunity to enter into discussions that will perhaps take us a lot further.


Accueil La Charte Historique et caractéristiques Textes de la Charte Un processus interculturel et plurilingue Quoi de neuf ? Activités Activités régionales Groupe Interculturel de Recherche Activités globales Thèmes forts Militaires et responsabilité Femmes et responsabilité Entreprises et responsabilité Environnement et responsabilité Cultures et responsabilité Gouvernance, Droits de l’Homme, et responsabilité Education et responsabilité Culture de responsabilité Art et responsabilité Interculturel, dialogue et plurilinguisme Finance et responsabilité Economie et Responsabilité Réflexions ... sur le concept de responsabilité ... sur la Charte des responsabilités humaines Outils d’action Audio & Video Posters, dépliants... Documents interactifs Méthodes Animer des débats et ateliers Contruire un réseau Informer, Eduquer Construire un processus de diffusion Liens Qui sommes-nous ? Le Comité International d’animation de la Charte Rencontre biennale des membres du comité international de la Charte A propos du site
	EN ES FR PT Autres langues
Série de Conférences-débats, Tbilissi, octobre 2004 Globalisation, diversity and minorities : discussion among teachers over the Charter’s first principle Mondialisation, diversité et minorités : débat entre enseignants autour du principe 1 de la Charte Individual and public responsibilities Responsabilités individuelle et publique De la Charte aux problèmes concrets Moving from the Charter to concrete problems Reflections of a reality : Civil society, terrorism, democracy, concrete actions Reflets d’une réalité : Société civile, terrorisme, démocratie, actions concrètes De l’incrédulité à l’intérêt prudent From incredulity to cautious interest Humanisme nouveau et diversité des cultures Petite réunion à la section philosophique de l’Université de l’Etat, le 28 octobre 2004 A group of actors around the text of the Charter Un groupe d’initiative autour du texte de la Charte Des pistes pour continuer : propositions d’initiatives Plans to go on with : initiative proposals	Accueil Activités Activités régionales Europe Géorgie et pays du Caucase Série de Conférences-débats, Tbilissi, octobre 2004 Publié le 1er juillet 2005 Traductions disponibles en : français (original) . Small meeting in the State University’s philosophy department, 28th October 2004 par Ina Ranson Thèmes généraux liés : Philosophie . Université .
	This was a more informal meeting where a friend invited me to speak with her colleagues – four men and two women – all teachers. As they were all very familiar with German philosophy, I spoke about Carl Améry (former chairman of PEN) who, going through the accounts of intellectual meetings in the East and West in the eighties, was surprised : “we all thought the crucial question was the confrontation between capitalism and communism – but already at that time, the problems were altogether different ones …the threat on our biosphere…” There was a lot of interest expressed for Hans Jonas’ book. They kept saying : everything that we are being told about globalisation at the moment is a hundred percent positive. When I spoke a bit about the social forums and Porto Alegre, I had to promise to come back and say more. Rights and duties The co-director of the University of Languages and Culture, Levan Lebanidze, a very well-known ethnologist and philosopher : You begin with rights : “We are all responsible for making sure that Human Rights are reaffirmed in our ways of thinking and in our actions”. I think stressing rights is exactly what’s going to lead to our ruin. I don’t like this beginning ! I found this comment unfair. But it came back to me when, on the plane back, I was flicking through the free magazine, encouraging me to benefit from attractive weekends just a few hours from Berlin and Paris : “you have the right !” The right to thoughtlessly pollute the atmosphere. Who wants to know that aeroplanes’ kerosene consumption does not come into any project restricting CO2s ? Who wants to get informed about what bothers them ? Who knows how to make a clear distinction between Human rights and abusive rights ? It seems a lot harder to gain awareness of responsibilities than to gain awareness of rights. Protection of the environment : the Charter alone is not enough… A student : “The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline is supposed to cross the Borjomi valley, a natural park where a mineral water spring renowned throughout the ex-USSR is located. The risks are huge for this natural treasure. What can we do ?” The Georgians really rallied together. The big protests in July and August and the speeches to the president were not in vain ; but British Petroleum, Total and Donald Rumsfeld are stronger. How does one answer back ? I know that in France, there is a new organisation, Sherpa, set up by the former secretary general of the International Federation for Human Rights, which aims to bring legal advisors’ expertise together in order to take action against multinationals that don’t respect international agreements. Sherpa is interested in the issue of this pipeline. It’s David against Goliath. And the Georgians are finding themselves between two avid Goliaths. I’m finishing with this difficult question. It reiterates that in addition to the Charter, we have to do something else ; and the same goes when we have to say that we don’t know. There are different ways to express our solidarity. As Edith emphasised, the Charter text is a pre-text. It asks us to engage with it and to adapt it by transforming it. It is also an opportunity to enter into discussions that will perhaps take us a lot further.

Small meeting in the State University’s philosophy department, 28th October 2004