The Law and Cross-cultural Dynamics in Europe

Meeting of the Cross-cultural Skills in the Social Services workgroup, Division of Research and Development in Social Cohesion, Council of Europe, February 17-18, 2009, Paris.

We met:

to launch a discussion on the legal frameworks that would:
— allow our societies to change toward a democratic management of cultural diversity,
— and help to integrate into the European institutions, essentially in the services, the concept of reasonable accommodation;
— to think about the relevance of introducing, in Europe, the concept of reasonable accommodation for a better interaction with migrants;

to draw up a proposal for a legal framework that can introduce / encourage cross-culturalism and institutional change in the multicultural European societies.

I was invited more especially to discuss the potential of such concepts as "reasonable accommodation," "multiculturalism," "complex equality," "multicultural and inclusive citizenship,” “minorities’ rights,” and "cultural rights."

My outlook is one of a Law anthropologist who has been interested for more than ten years in a more cross-cultural reinvention of our living together and who explores, more particularly, the cross-cultural challenges of contemporary normative transformations, which are marked by a transition from more pyramidal and state-centered forms of government toward more reticular, more participatory, and more dialog-based forms of governance.

Christoph Eberhard
Dialog / Human Rights and Cross-cultural Dialog

***

I. Framework of our considerations

II. Some basic points for considering the challenges of cross-culturalism in the consideration of cross-cultural skills in the social services

1) Cross-cultural dialog can only take place over time.
2) Cross-cultural dynamics only exist in specific situations. They are therefore fundamentally pluralistic.
3) Every human being is individually and collectively naturally ethnocentric.
4) Cross-culturalism is a dynamic reality.
5) Cross-cultural dynamics have different stages and time frames.

III. Basic options and objectives of cross-cultural action

1) Assimilation
2) Mono-culturalism
3) Multi-culturalism
4) Cross-culturalism

IV. Some specific proposals for legal frameworks to promote cross-cultural dynamics in Europe

1) Integrate cross-cultural dialog into the processes of public services.
2) Consider cross-cultural dynamics as more than simply bicultural dynamics.
3) Recognize the limits of the Institution and the wealth of community knowledge and know-how.
4) Avoid politicizing the challenges by recognizing the complexity of situations.
5) Put the responsibility of actors back into the basic values.

Documents

Droit et interculturalité en Europe (pdf, 160 ko)


Home The Charter History and characteristics Charter Texts A Cross-cultural and Multilingual Process What's new? Activities Regional Activities Intercultural Research Group Global Activities Central topics The military and responsibility Women and responsibility Companies and responsibility Environment and responsibility Cultures and responsibility Governance, Human Rights, and responsibility Education and responsibility Culture of responsibility Art and responsibility Cross-culturalism, dialog and multilingualism Finance and Responsibility Economy and Responsibility Think tank ... on the concept of responsibility ... on the Charter of Human Responsibilities Tools for action Audio & Video Cards, flyers... Interactive Documents Methods Facilitating debates and workshops Building a network Informing, educating Building a diffusion process Links Who are we ? The International Charter Facilitation Committee Biennial Meeting of the International Charter Committee Members About this site
	EN ES FR PT Other Languages
Innovative Projects, Experiences, and Ideas “To buy is a political act”: pathways towards a responsible consumption Nevertheless, there are alternatives: the experience of the cooperative of Mondragón Assuming Responsibilities in Daily Life: Responsible Consumption Building One’s Retirement around Human Responsibilities? Climate Warming and Our Common Responsibility: Becoming Informed So We Can Act Cross-cultural Listening and Dialog Our Common Responsibility to the Global Environment: The Europeans’ Ecological Debt The "Imperative of Responsibility" According to Hans Jonas The Ecological Footprint As a Tool for Awareness-raising on Individual and Collective Responsibility The Ecological Footprint as a Tool in Environmental Education The Law as a Mirror of Cultures. For Another Globalization.	Home Activities Regional Activities Europe Western Europe Innovative Projects, Experiences, and Ideas Published on 8 March 2010 Translations available in: français (original) . Español . The Law and Cross-cultural Dynamics in Europe by Christoph EBERHARD Associated Central Topics: Cross-culturalism, dialog and multilingualism . Associated General Topics: Public administration . Cross-cultural .
	Meeting of the Cross-cultural Skills in the Social Services workgroup, Division of Research and Development in Social Cohesion, Council of Europe, February 17-18, 2009, Paris. We met: to launch a discussion on the legal frameworks that would: — allow our societies to change toward a democratic management of cultural diversity, — and help to integrate into the European institutions, essentially in the services, the concept of reasonable accommodation; — to think about the relevance of introducing, in Europe, the concept of reasonable accommodation for a better interaction with migrants; to draw up a proposal for a legal framework that can introduce / encourage cross-culturalism and institutional change in the multicultural European societies. I was invited more especially to discuss the potential of such concepts as "reasonable accommodation," "multiculturalism," "complex equality," "multicultural and inclusive citizenship,” “minorities’ rights,” and "cultural rights." My outlook is one of a Law anthropologist who has been interested for more than ten years in a more cross-cultural reinvention of our living together and who explores, more particularly, the cross-cultural challenges of contemporary normative transformations, which are marked by a transition from more pyramidal and state-centered forms of government toward more reticular, more participatory, and more dialog-based forms of governance. Christoph Eberhard Dialog / Human Rights and Cross-cultural Dialog *** I. Framework of our considerations II. Some basic points for considering the challenges of cross-culturalism in the consideration of cross-cultural skills in the social services 1) Cross-cultural dialog can only take place over time. 2) Cross-cultural dynamics only exist in specific situations. They are therefore fundamentally pluralistic. 3) Every human being is individually and collectively naturally ethnocentric. 4) Cross-culturalism is a dynamic reality. 5) Cross-cultural dynamics have different stages and time frames. III. Basic options and objectives of cross-cultural action 1) Assimilation 2) Mono-culturalism 3) Multi-culturalism 4) Cross-culturalism IV. Some specific proposals for legal frameworks to promote cross-cultural dynamics in Europe 1) Integrate cross-cultural dialog into the processes of public services. 2) Consider cross-cultural dynamics as more than simply bicultural dynamics. 3) Recognize the limits of the Institution and the wealth of community knowledge and know-how. 4) Avoid politicizing the challenges by recognizing the complexity of situations. 5) Put the responsibility of actors back into the basic values. Documents Droit et interculturalité en Europe (pdf, 160 ko)